Cooperation in multicellular systems requires communication the
cooperating entities. Much of
that communication between the cooperating entities such as
cells in a multicellular
body, social insects in a colony, people in societies, or
computers in the Internet is not due to commands from some
central controller; it is indirect and distributed. Independent
entities deposit long-lived cues in an external
structures that are sensed by others. The cues may be attached
to connective tissue with in one body, shared nests such as
termite mounds, shared databases, or web-sites as the case may
be. One illustrative example is the way chess pieces on a chess
board structure the actions of chess
players who interact with each other by changing the locations
of the pieces. Stigmergy structures provide persistent
information that serves to organize otherwise independent
The term stigmergy was coined in the 1950’s  to put a name to such communication for social insects and the stigmergy structures that they build, e.g., termite mounds (photo below), ant hills, beehives and even the pheromone-marked ant trails of nomadic social ant species such as army ants. In the last two decades, the idea has been adopted by other disciplines including computer science.
Although the term stigmergy is relatively new, the phenomenon itself is ancient. The cytoskeletons within individual cells are stigmergy structures that help to organize internal cellular functions. The very bodies of all multicellular organisms are also stigmergy structures. Cells in a multicellular organism create a growing body whose shape and boundaries are defined by a non-living extracellular matrix created by the cell, e.g., connective tissues and bones. The cells deposit all sorts of cues, in the form of messenger molecules, in or on this matrix. The shape of the extracellular matrix and the signaling molecules attached to it direct the movement, differentiation, and specialized function of the cells. So it is fair to think of the bodies of animals and plants as stigmergy structures akin to very complex termite mounds.
Brains, the neuron-based information processing systems of
multicellular creatures, also depend upon stigmergy in the form
long-term memories laid down in persistent physical changes to
neurons and synapses. Long-term memory modifies behavior and
behavior in turn modifies memory...that's
the essence of stigmergy.
Computing relies on stigmergy structures in various sorts of digital memory as well --whether in the form of RAM, ROM, FLASH, disk file-systems, huge databases, or the Internet itself.
Stigmergy is intimately related to the somewhat slippery notion of "self." Whatever the philosophical niceties, self is clearly about the organism as a whole rather than just a collection of cells that share the same DNA. That is, self refers to a multicellular organism's body which includes both the cells of the organism and the nonliving extracellular matrix that gives shape and structure to the organism. The extracellular matrix, which is the organism's stigmergy structure, persists for the life of the organism whereas most kinds of cells die and are replaced many times over during the lifespan of the body. In a very real sense, cells are part of the self only insofar as they participate in the self-organizing dance of stigmergy.
Social insects, cooperating cells, cooperating neurons, and cooperating computers communicate both with signals and cues. Signals are active communication events in real-time whereas cues are information embedded in the stigmergy structure to be read and reread many times. Both are specialized messages in the sense that they mean different things to different specialized receiving cells (or insects or computers). However cues are further specialized by their location -- that is, in addition to the information intrinsic to their molecular form or digital content, there is information inherent in their location in the stigmergy structure. In chess terms, a pawn is just a pawn; the important information is which square on the board it occupies. Because cues have both a message content and a location, cues support more complex kinds of communication than do signals and hence tend to support more complex social organization. As Anderson & McShea report , complex ant societies rely more on cues whereas simple ant societies rely more on signals.
As is the case with social insects, cells in multicellular organisms communicate both by signals (polymorphic messenger molecules moving indiscriminately through blood, lymph or other liquids) and by cues (polymorphic messenger molecules attached to the extracellular matrix). For example, bone, when stressed, provides cues to osteocytes and other bone cells for its own reshaping to better handle the forces placed upon it. And smooth muscle cells in the walls of blood vessels modulate their contractility according to cues from the extracellular matrix . Not surprisingly, as with social insects, simple multicellular organisms communicate primarily by signals whereas complex multicellular organisms communicate more by cues.
Analogously, computing systems in complex human organization
businesses rely on records (cues) deposited in databases
structures), whereas loose organization, e.g., file-sharing, can
with real-time peer-to-peer messaging. Here again, multicellular
recapitulates biology. Stigmergy is ever present in
complex computing systems
More on Evolution of Computing
 See “Self-organization in social insects.” Bonabeau, E., Theraulaz, G., Deneubourg, J.L., Aron, S. & Camazine, S., Trends in Ecology and Evolution, vol 12, pp. 188-193, 1997.
 “Individual versus social complexity, with particular reference to ant colonies,” Anderson, C & McShea, D. W. Biol. Rev., vol 76, pp. 211-237, 2001. p. 228
 Extracellular matrix controls myosin light chain phosphorylation and cell contractility through modulation of cell shape and cytoskeletal prestress.” Polte, TR, Eichler, GS, Wang, N, & Ingber, DE. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 286: C518-C528, 2004.
Last revised 4/16/2014